One reason I have not joined the Calvinists is because they are not
completely right about me. I don't say that with indignity, but simply
as a fact. I have no grounds for any dignity of my own other than the
fact that I was created in the image of God (Jas.3:9). When I was an
unrepentant sinner the Calvinists had categorized me correctly as one
who, in my pride and revolt, had refused to accept the fact that I could
not in my fallen state choose God on my own initiative. But, those who
know me as a Christian who has considered but not joined the Calvinists,
categorize me as one they suspect of having a lingering pride that wants
to take some meritorious credit for having had faith to believe.
"You did not choose Christ," they say, "He chose you.," My humanistic thinking, they say, is the reason that I have not joined
their view.
I will confess that I am still a sinner who often overestimates my
own importance and on occasion have been in prideful revolt against
my Lord. But even in those times I have not really been disposed to
reject Christ. The point I am making is this: It is not some lingering
boastfulness that keeps me from crossing the Calvinist threshold. I
am not convicted by the Spirit of doing such boasting and I am confident
that a child of God would be convicted of such a thing at some point
in his life if it were part of his stance.
My stance is that whoever has not heard the gospel is disposed to
reject faith in God because of his sinful nature, but because of the
image of God, that lingers in every man's make-up, he is also capable
of believing it when he hears the gospel. He is capable of being enlightened
as John 1:9 indicates: "The true light that gives light to every
man was coming into the world." This act of belief, of course,
is not a consequence of man's initiative, but is one possible response
to the grace of the gospel proclamation which is God's initiative. I
am dependent on God who gave me the grace (because I had no will to
have his grace) to be able to respond to him (Romans 9:16). God's initiative
in bringing the gospel shows ("enlightens") a man that he
is deceiving himself, which allows him to rightly place his faith if
he will (Jn. 7:17).
By the gospel, God's grace grants us freedom. Faith is the act of
receiving that freedom. At times, when the Bible speaks of "the
faith" as being a gift of God, I understand it as a figurative
way (metonymy) of alluding to the "granting" being done. I
understand it this way because of the numerous times that faith is referred
to as a condition for salvation. Grace awakens us to the possibility
of believing. But, believing is our responsibility; faith is our responsibility.
Otherwise we could not be chided by the Lord; "O, ye of little
faith!"
It is God, for example who says to sulking Cain, "Do thou rule
over it; [sin]." Cain is made responsible. It is God who initiates
things. What God speaks to Cain is the gospel. [1] Cain is informed
by God about what is good for him and he then has the possibility of
knowing that he can do the good because it is God Himself who would
add the power for Cain. Will Cain have faith?
In this incident (Gen. 4:6,7), to "rule over it" is to
stop being angry at God, to put an end to resulting despair and to master
evil. Cain did not accept God's decision to recognize Abel's sacrifice
and not his own. Cain did not accept the will of God so expressed. He
does not believe that God loves him anyway. He thinks God is unjust.
The good, then, is to accept the decision of God whatever it might be,
including the will which gives preference to Able. if Cain will by faith
be in agreement with that will he would find the strength from God to
master anger, despair and evil.
MINIMIZE THE FALL--NOT
Everything of which a man is capable of from birth is a gift of God.
Paul says (1 Cor.4:7), "what have you that you did not receive?
If then you received it, why do you boast as if it were not a gift?" Even the capacity, when faced with God's word to have faith in God or
to keep trying to put faith in some other object, is a gift from God
in which I do not boast. There is in all men an essential part of their
humanity that may be touched by the proclamation of the gospel. [2]
In this sense all of us have within ourselves (by God's gifting) the
capacity of responding to the gospel in true faith.
There is no "method" for obtaining grace. Grace cannot be
grace and be subject to our control. But when the Spirit blows where
it wills and God's good news comes to us, as it did to Cain, it is not
an opportunity for "obtaining" grace; it IS grace!
I am sometimes accused of wanting to preserve an autonomy before God;
that I am following the age old heresy of human pride which cannot tolerate
everything being dependent upon the grace of God, including the predetermination
of my response. It seems clear to me, however, that my response is dependent
on the grace of God. There is nothing in me that has escaped the "fall" unharmed. God's grace is needed to restore me.
BOASTING IS FOR THE DECEIVED
An unbeliever indeed thinks that on his own initiative he is able
to choose to believe Christ. By scripture we know that is not the case.
At one point even I, a believer, thought that on my own initiative I
had chosen Christ, but as I reflected on scripture (John 15:16) I had
to admit the true nature of the case. I am aware of the hideous thought
that I might have resisted and rejected the gospel call but that does
not become a boast for me. It is only the hollow boast of those on Satan's
side who would resist the creator and celebrate instead that remaining
withered and perverted aspect of the divine image that is left in them:
that is, the self-caused choice in the face of God's initiative.
We know that what the unbeliever does is to suppress the truth in
unrighteousness (Romans 1:18). To suppress the truth, men must know
it. But a man deceives himself into thinking that life is in himself.
This is what Darwinists do. Not wishing to believe that life comes from
God they have devised a theory that exchanges the glory of the incorruptible
God for an image in the form of corruptible man.
Even the unbeliever was created with knowledge of God as a natural
function because it is natural to believe in God (Romans 1:19). But,
because of the break with God in Adam, we all suppress the truth about
God. As Solomon says, "Behold, this alone have I found, that God
made men upright, but they have sought out many devices (Eccl. 7:29)."
When I became a believer I saw that this had been my nature; there
came a renewing of my mind; I forsook the thinking that life was of
my choosing; that my freedom included choosing life on my own. I didn't
have to join the Calvinists to see this, but I did have to respond to
God's initiative.
CHARGES OF IDOL MAKING
There remains an aspect of the wrong opinion about me that is acutely
alarming to me and that has caused me to consider very carefully the
Calvinist position. It is the charge that I don't join because I want
to have a god in my image; a god who is limited and smaller. Calvinists
claim that I am rejecting their glorious, unlimited God for a much less
glorious, limited god. By not joining them they say I am insisting on
reducing the kind of God that really exists.
It is true that men make idols so that they can limit God. God judges
us. He speaks to us and challenges us about our sins and calls us to
repentance whereas idols do no such speaking. Idols are dumb; silent!
They are convenient and controllable and allow us to go on in our sins
because they are made after our image.
Calvinists say that by rejecting their doctrine I am constructing
in its place a god who is limited in power, limited in knowledge, and
reduced to one who changes like a human who changes by maturing or by
fickleness. They say it is my idolatrous tendency to make God more like
me and less like the way they say He really is.
This is a very frightening charge because I know Man has this tendency
and I'm not excluded. The sinful heart of an unbeliever tends to linger
on in the believer. It is called the "flesh" in the Bible.
It hates God and wants to serve a manmade god. So I know that in me
is both a desire to have God be less than He is and under my control,
and a desire to be surrendered to Him and under His unlimited control.
I am thankful that the latter is the stronger in me.
Although my heart cannot be trusted or discerned by me directly, I
can asses myself by certain outward signs: Am I persisting in sins or
am I turning from them? Am I aloof or am I loving the brethren? Am I
swallowed up in my own thoughts or am I listening to God and reading
His word and conversing with Him? If I am doing the latter of these
things it is not likely that I am making a false god of my own invention.
I am grateful to the Calvinists for their charge because it has made
me careful not to put manmade limits upon God. But, I have often wondered
if this fear of idol making has wrongly been the motivating influence
in some people's conversion to Calvinism.
Those who do convert to Calvinism usually don't have to abandon one
Arminian concept that is not completely correct, and that is the concept
of time. Both Augustine and much of today's Church have a different
view of God and time than that had by people of Bible times. In the
next chapter I will try to show how the earlier view of God and time
is the correct view that should change the way both Calvinists and Arminians
view time.
NOTES
Although there are circumstances where God does mock and laugh at unrepentant
sinners (Ps.2),
He is not doing this with Cain. I owe the commentary on Cain to Jaques
Ellul, _To Will & To Do_, Pilgrim Press.
In the parable of the sower and the seed, even those who are illustrated
by hard ground might
be touched by the gospel. These, however, have hardened themselves.
They have rejected a
response of faith and have let their hardness leave the seed for Satan
to remove. Others who
have initial faith do not continue in faith, but let the testings of
life overcome their faith (Jas. 1:21).